Interesting. I wonder if it had anything to do with this little tidbit:
>All analyses in experiment 1 include a “Week” factor to account for variation across research assistants; this factor does not interact with Phone Location in any analysis (all F < 1.27, all p > .28).
What was the variation? What was the factor? Why was it only needed in experiment 1 and not in the rest of the experiments?
Are we really supposed to believe that in 2008, some turtle-necked evil genius permanently impaired the entire world?
>All analyses in experiment 1 include a “Week” factor to account for variation across research assistants; this factor does not interact with Phone Location in any analysis (all F < 1.27, all p > .28).
What was the variation? What was the factor? Why was it only needed in experiment 1 and not in the rest of the experiments?
Are we really supposed to believe that in 2008, some turtle-necked evil genius permanently impaired the entire world?