This is absurdly reductionist to the point of uselessness.

What are you trying to convey with this tautology?

Who owns the buildings is irrelevant if demand exceeds supply and the occupancy rate is reasonable.

The focus on building ownership is just a distraction from the disastrous immigration policy.

Maybe the fact that being critical of mass immigration and its consequences would've labeled you as an extremist in the past decade?

These are not mutually exclusive conclusions.