What does wikipedians against censorship say about him? It seems to argue against censorship.
There's a subset of wikipedia editors who seem to be constitutionally unable to differentiate between "censorship" and "discretion". Try this one on:
"Hi, this article that doesn't seem to have anything to do with nudity has a picture of a naked woman at the top, where it is particularly likely to be problematic for people browsing at work. Here is a non-nude picture that illustrates the topic of the article equally well. Any objections to changing it?"
If you cry censorship, you do not know what that word means.
There's a subset of wikipedia editors who seem to be constitutionally unable to differentiate between "censorship" and "discretion". Try this one on:
"Hi, this article that doesn't seem to have anything to do with nudity has a picture of a naked woman at the top, where it is particularly likely to be problematic for people browsing at work. Here is a non-nude picture that illustrates the topic of the article equally well. Any objections to changing it?"
If you cry censorship, you do not know what that word means.
Here's the real discussion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pregnancy/Archive_5#Not_Sa...