Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wondered mid-article if it was partially AI generated, and to the article's point, if it was serious.

On the overarching question, standard coffee in the US was mostly weak drip and unsophisticated instant stuff, and I don't think most took coffee "seriously". Kids drinking it from teacher's room or not.

Starbucks and others gave it a more hip position with more variety and consideration, while still being something considerably different from "serious" coffee made by small independant shops for instance.

And now the author's complaining that coffee's image has changed again because Starbucks isn't the miracle company anymore. Does it matter much?

If anything the coffee culture that grew in parallel to these Pumpking Spice days is probably there to stay and "serious" coffee is probably stronger than it ever was considering the starting point.

I'm waiting for the next analysis on how the toast culture lost its lusture as avocado toasts are on the fall.



Interesting point, one could point to Starbucks and other coffee chains as the gateway drug, lowering the barrier to entry for somebody to get "into" coffee while setting a bar considerably higher than burnt diner coffee.

...While still delivering their own flavor of burnt junk, relative to the multitudes of third wave shops that have grown and thrived out of the category that Starbucks created.

So yes, the current version of Starbucks may be ridiculous, but the culture wave it led is a key reason every town or block is able to sustain a passionate small cafe or roastery.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: