Cute idea, and useful research to answer the question, but the experimental result is essentially nothing.
None of the examples generated anything semantically more complex than `0-0`.
Many scripting languages will tolerate meaningless input.
Instead of these extremely non-character-istic splatters, I think scribbles or random raster bitmaps would be better input.
2. When intentionally writing perl, half the time my "perl -c foo.pl" complains about syntax or badly used names (usu. misspellings), with the typo to correct being obvious. As a practical matter, it's not a problem.
I see a lot of semicolons in that ocr output, which might be cheating.
Many scripting languages will tolerate meaningless input.
Instead of these extremely non-character-istic splatters, I think scribbles or random raster bitmaps would be better input.