Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Back in the day you used to have to pay a bunch of money upfront to buy the software that allows you to develop software for a particular platform, then you were free to distribute your software as you wish.

If Apple is really concerned about keeping out the riff raff they could raise the annual flat developer fees.

But we all know that's not what they're actually concerned about - the app store is estimated to have 80% margins right now. They're just charging what the market will bear, and the market will bear quite a lot right now as they're part of a duopoly on smartphones.



> they're part of a duopoly on smartphones.

Well, that's another conversation then isn't it? If that's the case, then Apple and Google (Play) should be named then, yes?


Only if the justice department believes Google has been using its dominant market position to harm consumers.


Which it hasn’t been because there are alternative app stores, payment processors and sideloading.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: