Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That’s a depends situation. If you’re using direct service integration instead of Lambda, it can be cheaper. And, if you use VMs only as the front-end to push batches of requests to serverless compute you get the best of both worlds and the cheapest by a long shot. Not everything can fit in that model, but the things that do are magically inexpensive.

I’m actually working on a product to make that architecture more approachable (and cheaper yet). I’d be happy to hear from folks running network services on VMs and wishing there was a better way.



Do you mean that you can get actual scale-to-zero using that approach? I think the cost of the VM would not scale down like that, right?


That’s true, the front-facing VMs always need to be there (hence the product I’m working on — so at least you don’t need to run them). The real work is done in serverless, in batches. Basically I think the world needs something like API Gateway for UDP and custom TCP, but that targets serverless backends rather than VMs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: