Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How can it be an important result if nobody has peer reviewed it let alone reproduced it?

It's a potentially important claim



People keep saying peer review is just a sanity check but no one seems to really grasp it. I get it because internet discourse has overblown the validity of peer reviewed articles to an insane degree.

Peer review is just a sanity check. Authors and scientists and studies and papers are important or not independent of the peer review process.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: