Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm in favor of human moral development through means such as free speech. But "a sound fundamental philosophical justification" doesn't appear to have any meaning, or rather can mean anything to anyone. It can envelop humanity's destruction as easily as its flourishing, depending on where your identity lies.

I'd like to be able to deploy "natural" in defense of free speech, but I've found no substance to it. No premise beyond a personal value judgement, which I happen to share. So I default to appeals to utility.




>. But "a sound fundamental philosophical justification" doesn't appear to have any meanin

You're saying the entirety of moral philosophy has no meaning so people should just do whatever they feels like, that's a pretty barbaric position.

>So I default to appeals to utility

Utility also relies on a philosophical justification; if you throw out all philosophy, you also throw out utilitarianism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_rights_and_legal_right...




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: