Can we attribute the decline in quality to the decline in informative content proportional to garbage content?
Garbage content seems to be making massive gains year on year, while informative or high quality content has stagnated or even declined from data decay
I think part of the problem is that Google has a recency bias. Newer, more spammy, sources get priority over older ones - even if the older ones are of higher quality.
Garbage content seems to be making massive gains year on year, while informative or high quality content has stagnated or even declined from data decay