Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

i think its because sample based virtual instruments, while enormous in hard drive space, do a good job of approximating many classical instruments and have advanced enough to be useful without being difficult to implement.

I could learn a new synth or I could use the Spitfire Labs BBC Symphony Orchestra pack and spend a lot of takes playing with macro wheels and maybe some adjusting after to try to improve articulation to something more natural sounding. It would by a bear live but in the studio its easy.|

The synth would offer more customization but the sample one is good enough for most things, especially in a small/home studio setting.



Synth strings can be great, but in their own aesthetics. I'd argue the sample pack is much, much more realistic and rich sounding than any synth patch you can come up with. There's no easily programmable synth that can emulate the mixture of a dozen or so strings vibrating at slightly different pitches. Creating a single, somewhat realistic violin is almost impossible outside of very large physical models (there's a good model in Reaktor by Chet Singer). Even dedicated physical modelling synths fail at that task.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: