Your point hinged on billions in profit. Which you just made up, or assumed to be true for some reason. I don't think any of your points stand. Don't use fact you haven't checked as preconditions for points you want to make.
Have they gotten specific yet? Last I heard was the whole “not sufficiently candid” thing, which is really nebulous; hard to call it a farce really. It is a “to be continued.”
I’m going to wait and see before I get too personally attached to any particular position.
To think that "Non-Profit" means "Free" is pretty naive. There are operating costs to maintain millions of users. That doesn't mean they are trying to profit.
The hypocritical part is doing so right AFTER beginning to take off commercially.
An honorable board with backbone would have done so at the first inkling of commercialization instead (which would have been 1-2 years ago).
Maybe you can find a better word for me but the point should be easily gotten ...