My familiarity is that autistic people often experience heightened empathy not on the simulation/experiential divide but a difference in self other relations. That is, the autistic approach to intentionality places themselves verbatim in the position of the other, rather than the allistic which replaces themselves with the other.
I think given the normative social allistic approach, the autistic person generally has a higher pressure to over develop their ability to compensate. Additionally, as this process uses the self as referent, it is less swayed by differences in the other and more prone to being activitated.
I believe that this is neither good nor bad, but the austistic person often suffers on people's assumption of being able to choose where their empathy is directed, and doubly due the effects of this trait. Things like strong, real, emotional connections to inanimate objects are an instance of this that can both cause suffering or joy, but socially can be a burden.
Thus I can fully believe that your approach is functional and high performing. And that others are often flawed by it. There's an innate integrity in it, because you put yourself directly "in the shit" when you do it. I wouldn't discount it as Machiavellian or as dissociative. Could it be that the dissociation is the cost, not the cause?
> Could it be that the dissociation is the cost, not the cause?
I don't know. I know that the dissociation mostly developed as an attempt to escape from reality... my theories on this range from "I just really liked computers" to "autism and ADHD ripped away so much control over my body that I don't even want to try to control my body anymore, I just want to be an internet creature". It doesn't have much to do with the simulations, it just makes them better since I have the ability to dissociate, I guess.
I will admit you're right, though, about me putting myself in the position of others. I can feel exactly what I would feel if I were there, in that exact moment. Because, in a way, I sometimes am. Since the mind is a complex thing and all that. I'm constantly in multiple places at once, not physically or spiritually, but mentally. It happens when I'm having multiple conversations at once, it happens when I'm context-switching between multiple situations at once, it happens when I'm having cognitive dissonance, and that's not even counting the situations where there are actual other personalities active at the same time because dissociative identity disorder really is a giant clusterfuck.
I think given the normative social allistic approach, the autistic person generally has a higher pressure to over develop their ability to compensate. Additionally, as this process uses the self as referent, it is less swayed by differences in the other and more prone to being activitated.
I believe that this is neither good nor bad, but the austistic person often suffers on people's assumption of being able to choose where their empathy is directed, and doubly due the effects of this trait. Things like strong, real, emotional connections to inanimate objects are an instance of this that can both cause suffering or joy, but socially can be a burden.
Thus I can fully believe that your approach is functional and high performing. And that others are often flawed by it. There's an innate integrity in it, because you put yourself directly "in the shit" when you do it. I wouldn't discount it as Machiavellian or as dissociative. Could it be that the dissociation is the cost, not the cause?