> Why would this need to be addressed so singularly?
I don't know, I didn't write the law. They must have thought this is the better approach to start with. Perhaps they consider fighting one gigacorp at a time to be easier. After all, Apple has been left to grow unchecked until became larger than many countries.
Sure wish the US would just handle Apple the same way China has handled Alibaba growing too large. One can dream, right?
For context, they basically just said "you had your fun, it's over" and forcibly split the company in many smaller ones under new leadership.
I don't know, I didn't write the law. They must have thought this is the better approach to start with. Perhaps they consider fighting one gigacorp at a time to be easier. After all, Apple has been left to grow unchecked until became larger than many countries.
Sure wish the US would just handle Apple the same way China has handled Alibaba growing too large. One can dream, right?
For context, they basically just said "you had your fun, it's over" and forcibly split the company in many smaller ones under new leadership.