Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can someone please help decide what is the "best" backup software?

- Restic (https://restic.net/)

- Borg backup (https://www.borgbackup.org/)

- Duplicati (https://www.duplicati.com/)

- Kopia (https://kopia.io/)

- Duplicay (https://duplicacy.com/)

- Duplicity (https://duplicity.us/)



Do yourself a favor and use zfs as your primary backup, even though it means you'll have to replace your filesystem, it's just that good.

Faster than any other backup software (because it knows what's changed from the last snapshot being the filesystem itself but external backup tools always have to scan the entire directories to know what's changed), battle tested reliability with added benefit like transparent compression.

A bit of explanation on how fast it can be than external tools. (I don't work for the said service in the article or promote it.)

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/12/rsync...

Then you'll realize Borg is the one with least data corruption complaint on the internet which is good as your secondary backup.

Easily checked with, "[app name] data corruption" on Google.

And see who else lists vulnerability and corruption bugs upfront like Borg does and know the developers are forthcoming about these important issues.

https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/stable/changes.html

The term "best" apparently means reliable for backup and also they don't start choking on large data sets taking huge amount of memories and roundtrip times.

They don't work against your favorite S3 compatible targets but there are services that can be targeted for those tools or just roll your own dedicated backup $5 Linux instance to avoid crying in the future.

With those 2, I don't care what other tools exist anymore.


I use ZFS + Sanoid + Syncoid locally and Borg + Borgmatic + BorgBase for offsite.


Seconding zfs


Bupstash (https://bupstash.io/) beats Borg and Kopia in my tests (see https://masysma.net/37/backup_tests_borg_bupstash_kopia.xhtm...). It is a modern take very close to what Borg offers regarding the feature set but has a significantly better performance (in terms of resource use for running tasks, the backups were slightly larger than Borg's in my tests).


> Borg ... multiple hosts backup to same target ... Yes

It might be worth adding an asterisk there.

https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/stable/faq.html#can-i-b...


Indeed, thank you for pointing this out. I have added a footnote to the page accordingly.


Lacks features like mounting a filesystem as read-only to restore though. I find that makes restoring files much simpler. I'll look into bupstash some more perhaps but right now am very happy with Vorta/Borg.


Last I tried it, it didn't compress well. Did it improve? Does it have zstd compression?


Personally I use borg with BorgTUI (https://github.com/dpbriggs/borgtui) to schedule backups and manage sources/repositories. I'm quite pleased with the simplicity of it compared to some of the other solutions.


I can't give you a meaningful comparison between all of those, because I haven't used all of them, but I can say that I've been pretty happy with Restic in the time I've been using it.

Do you have any odd requirements that one might serve better than the rest? If you just want bog-standard backups, any of them will probably do.


Bacula

I've tried all of these, and none are as reliable or powerful as Bacula.

It's way more complex at first, but you will have peace of mind. And backup/restore speed is way faster.

You can even easily setup automatic restore jobs to prove your backups work!


Do you know how Bacula compares to Bareos? Bacula is on my to-do list to look at (also because I need tape backups), but the Bareos fork seems to have a more modern interface - but I've not stress tested either solution. The fact that Bacula has a Debian package and Bareos does not pretty much settles it already, but just curious if someone has actually tried both.


They're nearly identical otherwise, so just choose what works for you


My only complaint with Restic is that filesystem scans take too much time. I'm gonna switch over to ZFS probably though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: