Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Lossy compression is lossless over the information you decided to care about.

You may decide that the sound that's outside the human range of hearing isn't interesting. Or that the colours in your camera sensor that's just thermal noise can be safely ignored. Then you can throw it away and do lossy compression.

What you care about, an algorithm can't answer for you. Sometimes you may want to keep the inaudible sounds in a recording to better understand the audible ones. Sometimes you may be glad you kept the noise in a picture as it allowed you to later identify the model of camera.

There's no context-free answer to what matters. There's no subject-free answer to what matters, there's always a "who" it matters to.




True, but then I would argue (as a layman) that AGI would need to be able to guess what matters in a given context to really be AGI.


Matters to who?

To me? In that case, it sometimes does, sometimes doesn't, depending on how lazy I've been in constraining to the algorithm what I might want.

To itself? Then who can say if it isn't doing that already?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: