Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We used to test some installers on XFS servers for Redhat stuff. XFS need far fewer "corrupt drive" fixes that than ext4fs on those servers. (probably 1/10th as much corruption) and we were constantly just doing straight power offs on them (no soft shutdowns). I think XFS doesn't get the respect it deserves if you don't need a "fancy" file system like zfs or btrfs.


Huh, that does sound pretty appealing for sure.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: