Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How were Caesars' legions “private”? Are you sure you're not confusing with the fall of the Roman Empire, with autonomous military leadership in the provinces (but even then, calling them “private armies” would still sound anachronistic)


They’re loyalty was to Caesar or their general to give them a share of the loot they were conquering.

This started with the Marian reforms.


> This started with the Marian reforms.

Per a post a couple weeks back by the same author as TFA, those weren't a thing actually: https://acoup.blog/2023/06/30/collections-the-marian-reforms...


The most relevant quote I could easily find: "Rewarding soldiers with loot and using conquered lands to form colonies wasn’t new and Marius doesn’t standardize it, Augustus does."


> How were Caesars' legions “private”?

The Roman state authorised the raising of legions. But the (pro)consuls raising them were responsible for paying them. Think: Prighozhin.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: