Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's only true if you're following the "build to flip" model. Many supposedly companies all around the world become successful businesses by focusing on a problem that is perhaps less ambitious, but makes money.



I am not sure I follow your comment.

For most startups, if I understand correctly, the founders get rich on a liquidity event - either the company getting sold or IPO'ing.

So eventually you are going to flip, if things go well, right? Or go public in the rare but usually better outcome.

Anyway this is Andreessen's view. I work on a "smaller problem" right now. :)


Absolutely not. There are many ways for a founder to get rich. Liquidity is just one of them. A pretty standard way is for the company to start issuing dividends. The founder is presumably a major shareholder, and so if a big dividend is issued, they'll get a big chunk of that.

Obviously if you've raised VC, then that won't work - though angels will probably be more understanding. So, the conclusion is, liquidity events are only necessary if you've raised VC money. So don't raise VC money if you don't have to.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: