If you believe this, you should find it pretty easy to indemnify me for the hospital I am starting where I will operate and practice medicine. Be aware that I have no degree in medicine and have majored in Mathematics. Since the free market is a true religion, there must be no regulation preventing this. My hospital is able to compete on pure outcomes.
Of course, I don't actually think you believe this bit about the free market. I think you've been trained to rant here because this community rewards views like that.
You scoff, but read some of the other comments here:
"More like running many kinds of businesses has become more hassle than its worth. Medical malpractice premiums are very high"
"This is the kind of economic distortion that should be expected when onerous government-imposed regulation of practitioners, medication, and medical devices creates barriers to entry that reduce competition. While such regulation may have been imposed to try to increase safety, quality, and consistency, for example, it also ends up interfering with the incentives of the participants."
> Of course, I don't actually think you believe this bit about the free market.
I do believe it. What I said was "a significant portion of the population is vehemently opposed to any regulation of capital", which is not to say that the entire population is opposed. In fact, the population is very divided over this. There's more than one religion. :-)
In any case, the problem as I see it is that capital is very creative and inventive and coming up with new and terrible ways to extract profit, and regulation of these new terrible things comes far too slowly, if ever, precisely because the public is so divided, creating legal gridlock.
You're talking about old regulation. Of course long ago we've established regulations for the provision of medical care. Whereas private equity taking over everything is a relatively new phenomenon.
> I think you've been trained to rant here because this community rewards views like that.
As long as you call it "alternative" medicine, you should actually have a lot of latitude to do so. If you get to the point where you actually kill someone after cutting them open and rooting around, or poisoning them too much, then you might run into some regulation. But if you can avoid that, I suspect you'll be fine.
Yep, just like other "religions", alternative medicine is protected in the US and allowed to operate with near-impunity. The US loves religious freedom, and extends that to almost anything that resembles a religion.
Of course, I don't actually think you believe this bit about the free market. I think you've been trained to rant here because this community rewards views like that.