I think we need to take into account profits and careers of people producing news.
Mostly, news is a business. It will inevitably distort reports to make more profit. Even the most well-intentioned editors and journalists will be outcompeted those who make better stories.
I guess this mechanism works on the level of people and organizations.
Also, people who argue against Aaron's idea tend to forget that there are other sources. Books, in-depth articles, discussions of experts may provide a better understanding. However, it's much more effort. If you really want to be informed, then, it's work.
Mostly, news is a business. It will inevitably distort reports to make more profit. Even the most well-intentioned editors and journalists will be outcompeted those who make better stories. I guess this mechanism works on the level of people and organizations.
Also, people who argue against Aaron's idea tend to forget that there are other sources. Books, in-depth articles, discussions of experts may provide a better understanding. However, it's much more effort. If you really want to be informed, then, it's work.