Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>Are they saying that an English company (where sports betting is legal) taking bets from English punters is running afoul of Maryland law? //

Didn't Britain just extradite (or at least accede to an extradition 'request') a young man to the US for operating a service providing media links (but apparently no copyright material) - where it's likely that his actions were wholly legal under English law and he never set foot outside of the country ...

Seems like USA has their way regardless of other peoples democracy.

--

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9013408/Student...




Ow, you touched a sore spot, we Canadians did exactly the same thing by extraditing a fellow who was selling grass seeds by mail to US citizens. Strangely (sarcasm intended), we have refused such requests for the operators of online pharmacies, who employ a lot of people and generate sales for some big and influential Pharma companies in Canada.


It's not strange at all: Canada extradites people if the actions they are accused of are crimes in Canada.

Drug trafficking, for all that it generally isn't enforced in the case of marijuana, is illegal in Canada; so a Canadian accused of trafficking drugs into the US was extradited. Selling prescription medications to patients with proper prescriptions is legal in Canada.


But selling marijuana seeds is not (was not?) illegal in Canada.


Viable marijuana seeds are included in Schedule II of the CDSA. The law isn't enforced, but it's still there.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Drugs_and_Substances...

It appears that, while non-viable seeds are explicitly legal, there does not appear to be any prohibition against viable seeds, unless they are considered a marijuana "preparation". I suspect there's some case law floating around where a court has decided whether or not cannabis seeds are considered a marijuana preparation.

Edit: Erowid is somewhat helpful in this regard, although the linked article is broken:

http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/cannabis_law.shtml


I am not a lawyer, but I would be very surprised if Canadian courts didn't interpret that text in accordance with the general principle that all words have meaning -- i.e., explicitly stating that non-viable seeds are legal implies that the intention was that viable seeds are not legal.


I was under the impression that the law prohibited viable seeds but due to a loophole (you can't be certain a seed is viable or not) they couldn't stop people with any seed. I might be remembering this all wrong.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: