Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Using \+ instead of \; will do the same (fork less).

du -a will need to do a stat to get the file size, which is comparatively expensive; I don't think find will (not sure)?




You're right, find won't call stat() unless it needs to. It doesn't need to for recursing through the directory tree because readdir() returns dirent.d_type these days to determine if a name is a directory.

Yes, those stat() calls can be very slow in aggregate on a large tree, especially from HDD (due to seeking) or network filesystem, if the stat information isn't already in cache.


Oh, I forgot about \+. I still pipe to xargs every single time.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: