> What is the real criterion for a machine to be considered intelligent?
I reckon not many have ever said that machines can't be intelligent, in any way.
I think the most compelling question is: what makes them "human like" intelligent.
Passing a multiple choice test is not an actual measure of human intelligence, it's IMO a test of "semantic searching" abilities, that machines can be trained to emulate.
I reckon not many have ever said that machines can't be intelligent, in any way.
I think the most compelling question is: what makes them "human like" intelligent.
Passing a multiple choice test is not an actual measure of human intelligence, it's IMO a test of "semantic searching" abilities, that machines can be trained to emulate.