From https://simonwillison.net/2023/May/27/lawyer-chatgpt/ (which has the dates)
> Mar 1st, 2023 is where things get interesting. This document was filed—“Affirmation in Opposition to Motion”—and it cites entirely fictional cases! One example quoted from that document (emphasis mine):
GPT-4 wasn't available until March 14th ( https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 ), so we're dealing with 3.5 here.
Where was 3.5 advertised to do more than generate plausible language in a conversation and who is making those claims?
From https://simonwillison.net/2023/May/27/lawyer-chatgpt/ (which has the dates)
> Mar 1st, 2023 is where things get interesting. This document was filed—“Affirmation in Opposition to Motion”—and it cites entirely fictional cases! One example quoted from that document (emphasis mine):
GPT-4 wasn't available until March 14th ( https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 ), so we're dealing with 3.5 here.
Where was 3.5 advertised to do more than generate plausible language in a conversation and who is making those claims?