That is correct and not in contradiction to what I wrote. Not absolving any corporates here that willingly partnered with the Nazis.
What it doesn't say is that those heads of those corporate entities could go against the political leadership when exercising their power and autonomy (very late stages not so sure, never looked at that in detail) - their power come from an alignment of sorts. You can of course say, if everything is political in a system, then maybe the flip side is everything is corporate - but that didn't hold for the sources of physical violence, for example.
Purely military leadership possibly a little bit (more), because that was "below" political leadership in a way.
What it doesn't say is that those heads of those corporate entities could go against the political leadership when exercising their power and autonomy (very late stages not so sure, never looked at that in detail) - their power come from an alignment of sorts. You can of course say, if everything is political in a system, then maybe the flip side is everything is corporate - but that didn't hold for the sources of physical violence, for example.
Purely military leadership possibly a little bit (more), because that was "below" political leadership in a way.