Why are you presuming that UBI will be funded through creating more money, instead of redirecting money and/or increasing taxes? Does that change your conclusion?
Reducing taxes will not meaningfully increase economic opportunity for people in poverty, because they are not the causes of most people's poverty. Reducing regulation may help, but only because "regulation" is broad and includes things like onerous means-testing that makes it harder for people in need to get resources. Jobs help, and AFAIK there's not much regulation making it harder to get a job.
No. The basic version goes lowering taxes = more money in pockets but same output = inflationary.
It's not necessarily that simple but in any case you have it completely backwards.
Let's apply the ole reductio absurdum and see how it shakes out.
Bloat an already obese government by cranking taxes up to 100%, society collapses.
Put the government on the fasting cure, starve the beast, and most folks end up with more in their pocket and happier.
How about I add $100 tax to each apple sale? What happens to apple prices? I'd be forced to finally develop a taste for cherry pie.
How much and who to tax have been arm wrestled over since humans figured out that houses are nicer than caves.
Cities need both taxes and sewers to survive, but too much of either will stink enough to drive off anyone who can.
Take a peek at That Which is Seen and That Which is Not Seen [1]. Bastiat had his head screwed on straight for a Frenchman, and had it figured out in 1850.
Sure. Or starve an already cash-strapped government by lowering taxes to 0%, society collapses. What is your point exactly?
Other notable things: America's historic tax rates (pre-Reagan), social democratic leaning countries. Higher happiness, somehow. Top marginal rate doesn't affect the vast majority of people, should go without saying.
But you changed the subject. We were discussing what relative tax changes may or may not do to inflation, not your libertarian dreams.
Reducing taxes will not meaningfully increase economic opportunity for people in poverty, because they are not the causes of most people's poverty. Reducing regulation may help, but only because "regulation" is broad and includes things like onerous means-testing that makes it harder for people in need to get resources. Jobs help, and AFAIK there's not much regulation making it harder to get a job.