Your idea combines what feels like a significant percentage of randomness while still having enough participation to rationalize buy-in.
It's tough to want to yield control of an important choice to a random number generator... though that's not an inaccurate description for this.
I like this as a perspective on "the illusion of choice". Part of me hates the phrase because I want to believe that I can take meaningful action.
Your idea combines what feels like a significant percentage of randomness while still having enough participation to rationalize buy-in.
It's tough to want to yield control of an important choice to a random number generator... though that's not an inaccurate description for this.
I like this as a perspective on "the illusion of choice". Part of me hates the phrase because I want to believe that I can take meaningful action.