Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Agreed, don't want to discourage this project as it is helpful to have more tools to learn the rather deep and complex Git interface, but changing Git functionality under the hood is a big no-no in my mind. Using this tool on an existing Git repository and rewriting history could get the book thrown at you by more senior engineers.



> get the book thrown at you by more senior engineers.

We're all professionals working in a professional environment. "Git jail" isn't a thing. The "Git courts" won't take away your ability to use Git.

If anything, this would be an opportunity for a senior engineer, you know the people that are supposed to mentor and role model juniors, to give guidance on how to revert in the future.


I rewrite history all the time. And this is just porcelain. No one will be able to tell whether you rebase/reset/amend or use it.

I've got more than a decade working with the tool and use rebase daily. Hasn't been a problem yet.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: