I went back and looked it up, the piece he wrote is called "Torture vs Dust Specks." The part about bombing countries who build data centers is in the submission editorial.

This is misinterpreted, he calls for an international treaty backed by military. One sees what he wants to see.

I already mentioned the treaty:

> already advocates bombing non treaty participants if they build a datacenter.

You seem to misunderstand what an international ban treaty is. Nuclear proliferation ban included non signatories etc.

Are you talking about the NPT? Can you detail the military strike options it allows if a non-party acquires nuclear weapons?

Looking Iran,Iraq,any country that has a bioweapons program etc. It's pretty trivial to understand what Eliezer meant if you truly want to.

Nice dodge. It isn't in the non-proliferation treaty.