This is the same argument people use against the 2nd amendment, but it fails for similar reasons here.
If we accept that the public having access to GPT-4 has the same level of risk as the public having access to nukes would than I'd argue that we should treat
GPT-4 the same way as nukes and restrict access to only the military. I don't think that's the case here though and that since the risks are very different, we should be fine with not treating them the same.
If we accept that the public having access to GPT-4 has the same level of risk as the public having access to nukes would than I'd argue that we should treat GPT-4 the same way as nukes and restrict access to only the military. I don't think that's the case here though and that since the risks are very different, we should be fine with not treating them the same.