Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is it just me or is this the least intuitive format imaginable? The type def is something like:

    type Message = string
    type Speaker = 'system' | 'user' | 'assistant' | 'system name=example_user' | 'system name=example_assistant'
    type CML = ('\n' | '${Speaker}\n${Message}' | {token: '<im_start>'|'<im_end>'})[]
I'd expect something more like...

    type Message = string
    type Speaker = 'system' | 'user' | 'assistant' | 'example_user' | 'example_assistant'
    type CML = {message: Message, speaker: Speaker}[]


Will all make more sense with upcoming releases, we have a lot of extensions in the works :).


Somehow, seeing OpenAI employees adding smilies just makes the sense of impending doom even stronger


Because they're being a good user, for their good Bing.


They are a good OpenAI employee :) You are a bad user


I am trying to work out the odds of the OpenAI employee not being human.


Just say you think it's human. Saying you think it's not makes them add 50 million parameters, each time.


It's a nice way to say "Hello there :)"


:-P


When this is extended to have multiple system roles as designated agents, with mechanisms for the assistant to ping a specific agent for more information or completion of a subtask so devs can route that to secondary AIs or services, that’s going to be a very big deal.

Is that what you’re building toward here?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: