The article is incredibly nuanced, and answers many more questions than only "is this method any good?"
I'd also say it's not correct to place rereading at low effectiveness. The result on the article is more complicated than that.
Also, the article is mostly about memorization learning, and entirely about things with correct/incorrect answers. How well this generalizes for learning the things you need outside of schools isn't there at all.
The article is incredibly nuanced, and answers many more questions than only "is this method any good?"
I'd also say it's not correct to place rereading at low effectiveness. The result on the article is more complicated than that.
Also, the article is mostly about memorization learning, and entirely about things with correct/incorrect answers. How well this generalizes for learning the things you need outside of schools isn't there at all.