We aren't even clear about what the difference is between AI and intelligence. These are just loaded words with no clear definition.
Given that we don't even fully understand how the human brain works we can't even specify how close or how different these things are to the way we think.
Articles like this aren't really open minded. How can you claim AI is a mirror when you don't even fully understand the thing that it is reflecting?
Do you have a rigorous definition of intelligence that is actually reductive and doesn't punt the definition to other ill-defined words like "reasoning" or whatever ?
Unless you can give such a definition of intelligence, then you are in no position to assess whether these systems are intelligent (or in what way, to what extent) or not, even to the extent of meeting your own criteria whatever that may be!
Sports illustrated already laid people off for AI. Artists already created a lawsuit.
There's a lot of people over hyping this, but there is an even larger group of people downplaying everything and refusing to believe that a paradigm shift in AI has just occured.
And you downplaying AI in every single thread like it's something completely insignificant is even less compelling. Are you seriously not at least a little impressed with recent developments?
As it stands, these systems have yet to make a compelling case for intelligence.