> I genuinely - and possibly misguidedly - believe that even something like
^\w+([-+.']\w+)*@\w+([-.]\w+)*\.\w+([-.]\w+)*$
all those \w & \W's? c'mon, that's the easiest RE parsing task you could possibly confront!
it is really difficult to look at RE expressions, but it's also really hard to think of a better way
> I genuinely - and possibly misguidedly - believe that even something like
> might just as well be written in BrainFuck.all those \w & \W's? c'mon, that's the easiest RE parsing task you could possibly confront!
it is really difficult to look at RE expressions, but it's also really hard to think of a better way