It's interesting that this is regarded as a problem for Elementary OS but the far-and-away market leader in Linux, Red Hat, makes the same decision. There is no supported upgrade path between RHEL major versions besides reinstallation.
This makes me wonder... is the policy itself problematic, or the support window the problem? If Elementary offered five- or seven-year support cycles, would the objection remain?
This makes me wonder... is the policy itself problematic, or the support window the problem? If Elementary offered five- or seven-year support cycles, would the objection remain?