I did journalism in high school and I know quite well that how you present true information (framing) or distort true information (for example, by comparing African salaries to the US) is done intentionally to make the reader feel something- guilt, anger, a desire to vote for somebody specific.
Does experience in high-school journalism support the claim that professional journalism is all a conspiracy to manipulate the reader? I doubt it, and I edited my high-school newspaper for two years lol
Did I say conspiracy? No. I'm making a generalization. If you have sources for objective journalism, I'd love to see them. The closest I've seen was the Economist about 5-10 years ago.
Topical example to back up the claim that newspapers try to make you feel stuff, Prince Harry, UK tabloid headlines. Same fundamental information in all cases:
