Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

FedNow is no different from Zelle; it seems to me banks could still mess it up, and most of the complaints here (that you can't reverse a transaction you sent) would still apply to it, since that's kind of the point.


I would wait and see. It's not like they're ignoring fraud management:

https://www.pymnts.com/news/payment-methods/2022/fednow-pilo...

"FedNow Service features will help participating financial institutions conduct investigations and provide returned funds connected to fraud and errors. Beyond mitigating fraud through the design of the service, Stanescu noted that the Fed is exploring opportunities to collaborate with the industry on consumer education and outreach programs to help identify and prevent scams and promote strong enrollment and authentication processes. In the meantime, the value proposition inherent in irrevocability remains intact: receivers have protection and a guarantee that good funds have hit their account and can be used immediately."


I disagree - it seems a lot more like SEPA in Europe. The non-reversibility seems similar to SEPA fast transactions (ie, similar to fedwire) as well.

The fact that they're using ISO20222 is also a clue that they're probably picking up best-practice from European and Asian networks.


My biggest complaint with Zelle is my bank helps me by including Zelle in my bank account with easy setup. Some banks it's just included. I'd like a hard lock out on it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: