Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes that's a fair criticism. I still want to use Spotify for discovery, and I'm not an audiophile, so the quality ends up being sufficient for me.


Yeah of course, if it suits you then I'm happy for you! It's just that the author rants about other tools downloading music from YouTube (which is also fair criticism of course), and then goes on and does the thing that's just as bad (or so says the audiophile zealot inside me).

(FWIW, there were some tools that could rip out the exact Ogg stream as used by Spotify, but I don't think they're working now.)


Yes to be honest though going to greater lengths to extract high quality audio reaches a personal point where I'd rather try searching for the artist on Bandcamp or SoundCloud to buy lossless/high-quality audio, although everyone has a different personal point and the avenues in which you can buy good audio from the artist may not always exist. My thought process goes as: "If I want good audio quality, that means I must think the artist is pretty good, ergo I should definitely try buying it in file format somehow".

Thanks for clarifying that point about spytify.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: