Yes, there must be a reason. It's described extensively in the proceedings of the case.
What seems most plausible to me, is that we, aliens to Luxembourgh copyright law, outsiders to the court case, unaware of the actual text of the ruling, jump to unfounded conclusions based on our gut feeling and superstitions.
You seem to have a lot of trust in the Luxembourg district court :)
Maybe there is something in the proceedings that explains the absurd ruling, but I really doubt it. We'll see how the story plays out. I don't think this judgement will hold.
What seems most plausible to me, is that we, aliens to Luxembourgh copyright law, outsiders to the court case, unaware of the actual text of the ruling, jump to unfounded conclusions based on our gut feeling and superstitions.