Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The issue is that the average person doesn't consume photos and videos on their large 4k monitors. That's an enthusiast niche at best. That alone a market sustaining a large multinational co does not make.

Sensibly, workflows optimize for the smartphone consumption use case.

And yes, that hurts as photographers who obsessed over sharpness and pixel-level fidelity since the invention of digital cameras, but that just doesn't seem to be where the zeitgeist is at anymore. People never really cared in the first place.

It's similar to how music producers obsess over whether a particular synth sound was made with analog gear or was a "cheap digital knockoff". The listener never cared in the first place. They just want to be moved wherever it is that they are, which happens to be on the phone 99% of the time in photography.



> The issue is that the average person doesn't consume photos and videos on their large 4k monitors.

If you want to further process the image you want the best quality input you can get. Think digitally zooming/reframing, or choosing from a bigger dynamic range to use the colors you prefer. In a lower quality input you might be stuck with whatever photo you took, while the high-quality input gives you more information to correct the picture, even if the end resolution ends up being the same.

P.S. Good printed photos also have more definition that most monitors (idk if 4k, but I believe comparable), for products like printed wedding photos.


>The issue is that the average person doesn't consume photos and videos on their large 4k monitors. That's an enthusiast niche at best."

Maybe. I do not care. I only use phone as to call, GPS, controlling some gadgets, take a pic and that is it. I do the rest on PC on big screens.


When you edit or crop you lose information. It's good to start with extra.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: