Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem with that approach is that short sellers are explicitly trying to manipulate the market because they have a vested interest. It is not uncommon for short sellers to oversell a weakness due to this.

Sorting out the “good” short sellers from the “bad” is a tough job. One that good financial journalists do as a matter of course.



A short seller who does that faces jail however. Compare that to journalists who have no such downside to sensationalism or "errors" in their facts.


Notice I specifically said “oversell a weakness”. If what a short seller says is true and then they add their analysis, which presents a dire case, that is largely not seen as illegal market manipulation.

Activist funds do this every day.


> journalists who have no such downside to sensationalism or "errors" in their facts

There are multiple libel and defamation cases in play in almost every competent jurisdiction at any given time.


Which, at worst, is dismissed in bankruptcy court. No amount of liable or defamation can land you in jail. At least not in the US...


> is dismissed in bankruptcy court

Defamation and libel cases against journalists regularly pay out. (They pay out infrequently against public figures, in part because the threshold is higher and in part because journalists are more careful with them.)


Bankman-Fried was paying journalists to write nice things about him, so surely he was a public figure.


Coursr manipulation can, and does, so.


What is Coursr?


Course, typing regularly in three languages had me turn of auto-correct. Sometimes, it backfires...


Course as in share price etc?

I believe... Unless you profit by it, you can say what you want to cause share prices to go up or down and it is not a crime.

Is that incorrect?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: