Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>Why would anyone in their right mind choose to put effort into creating original art if there is "one easy trick" to get around copyright by simply turning their art into a model that can be used to churn out things they could have produced?

Why do some artists still paint on canvas instead of using photoshop or krita, where you can easily ctrl+z any mistake, never need to mix any paint, can move layers up and down, etc. etc. etc.?

Why do some photographers still shoot anything smaller than large format with film when medium format and full frame digital cameras exist?

Why do some people still use analog synths when Native Instrument's Komplete exists?

Why do some guitarists still use amplifiers when they could use an AxeFx/Kemper/Neural DSP?

Most of those options are also more expensive, on top of being more inefficient/difficult/generally burdensome, yet people still do them.

People do a lot of things that are not necessarily the most efficient way to do something. They like the minor differences, or enjoy the process, or many other things.

I also don't see how SD and similar get around copyright. Even if training these models on copyrighted images is legal, that doesn't mean that the output they produce necessarily is. It doesn't matter how I create a depiction of Iron Man, be it SD or a paintbrush and canvas, I do not have the rights to reproduce him. And for things that can't be protected by copyright, such as style, I am not hindered by it no matter if it is created with SD or colored pencils on a sketchpad.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: