Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

As a concept, I can see the positives in Rocky.

As a user, I struggle because of one main reason. The seeming lack of LTS version either currently or planned.

I currently am predominantly Debian. Which is inherently LTS, and generally works Just Fine (TM) except when you fall into something where they are a just a bit too cautious (e.g lack of in-house PHP 8 option in the current Debian Bullseye release - nothing in main repo, nothing in backports, you have to go to an external repo).

I refuse to use Ubuntu because of their increasingly commercial smell. I tried SUSE but always felt a bit uncomfortable with some of its more exotic sysadmin tendencies.

Which kind of leaves me in the market for another LTS platform.




> As a user, I struggle because of one main reason. The seeming lack of LTS version either currently or planned.

> I currently am predominantly Debian. Which is inherently LTS

In what possible way is Rocky not LTS? Its releases have longer lifespan than Debian, even with Debian LTS releases


Yeah, that. One of the driving points of RHEL (and all the downstreams as a result, like Rocky) is that you get a minimum of 10 years of support for every release.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: