NYT article "Mr. Musk, who took on about $13 billion in debt to finance the deal for Twitter, must also pay lenders about $1 billion in interest payments annually."
Guess we will have to agree to disagree. Never said he was going to make a profit. In fact the opposite. What you are describing is not an Investor but a Donor. Take a look at these equity investors/donors - not lenders.
Fidelity Management & Research Company
DFJ Growth IV Partners
Honeycomb Asset Management
Sequoia Capital Fund
All these financial companies have accepted money from retirement funds, pensions etc on the assumption that they will get more money in return. Please don't troll me by saying they could have given him money without seeking returns. We both know that just isn't the case.
Given the headlines I'd seen, I was thinking more like "convinced Larry from Oracle" when hypothesising someone could have given him money without seeking returns.
I'd agree that isn't the case for many on this list :)
