Thanks but your link has two sentences and then is interrupted by an input box to subscribe to your newsletter and by the time I made it to there my reading was again interrupted, this time by an obnoxious pop up prompt again asking me sign up for the newsletter. Is there a reason to be this aggressive? It's hard to believe this is a successful strategy. If someone enjoys your content they will sign up after they've actually been able read the article. Who signs up for a newsletter before they've even been able to read the first paragraph? I didn't bother with the rest of your link after this.
Thanks for letting me know. It’s a Substack thing not something I’ve chosen to do - I’ve tried to see if I could could turn off all pop-ups in the past without success. I didn’t know it was quite that bad so will have another look and possibly feedback to Substack.
Sorry I didn't mean to imply that this was your choice. It was a general rant against the sorry state of these platforms that get in the way of the very product they are supposed to be promoting. It sounds like content I would be very interested in. Do you have a blog or somewhere else where this content also lives? Cheers.
I actually owe you a huge thank you for pointing out how bad the experience was!
I genuinely had no idea how awful it was - of course you don't see pop-ups if you are logged in. To be fair to Substack the control to turn off pop-ups was there but it was turned on by default and a bit buried away in the UI.
I've removed any mid-article calls to action and turned off pop-ups now so hopefully a much better and less aggressive experience.
On the S/360, the article I linked to was a short look at how complex some S/360 instructions were and at how assembly used to be written using pen and paper. If you're interested in more on S/360 Assembly then the principles of operation may be worth a scroll through. [1]
Thanks again - really appreciate that you fed back rather than just closing your browser window.
