Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I can't speak for grandparent commenter. However, I can point out that the standard library for Java 17 has a TOTAL of 4,388 classes. TODAY. A quarter-century after the timeframe that they're talking about:

https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/allclasse...

So if ~10k classes were really written in a year, then I can only assume that most of that was the compiler or virtual machine runtime (i.e. C++ code) rather than the standard library Java code.

Regardless of how anyone feels about "verbosity" or "design patterns" in Java application code, the underlying JDK is pretty inarguably one of the most solid and impressive pieces of tech ever developed. I'm not throwing any rocks at that codebase.




>the underlying JDK is pretty inarguably one of the most solid and impressive pieces of tech ever developed.

I agree, JVM is impressive.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: