Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Of course, it is hard to say without knowing more about it, but it seems that jiggawatts solution is closer to optimal than the second one. The 50GB database could fit on a USB drive after all and we know empirically that a single SQL server database was able to handle the requests since the old system worked.

Also, the fact that a consulting company was able to turn a part time gig for one person into a $100M+ project at the taxpayer's expense is very frustrating.



typical technical forum, thinking they know the best solution based upon a 1 paragraph description.


That’s all we have presumably.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: