> This one is truly outrageous - "depict"??? There goes 5/6 of human culture. I seriously doubt you can find much literature or cinema that doesn't "depict [...] hatred or discrimination of protected groups or individuals".
Of course the policy as written is outrageous, dumb, and silly even by clown world standards. You couldn't make Roots or many other thought-provoking works today with a proper reading of that policy.
However, the real goal of this policy probably isn't to dictate actual policy into stone tablets for the masses to follow. The real goal of the policy probably is to give PayPal carte-blanche to do whatever the hell they want to dictate culture and impact politics without getting sued.
If you become annoying or a political adversary of PayPal's management, they can find something to ban you and hurt you with.
If you technically violate the policy, but aren't their opposition, I'm sure you will be ignored.
Yes, I was just talking about the face-value of what they wrote. Obviously, they won't stop doing business with Netflix just because Netflix is streaming Shindler's List, though that is in clear violation of this policy as written - they will selectively enforce this whenever the mood hits them.
Of course the policy as written is outrageous, dumb, and silly even by clown world standards. You couldn't make Roots or many other thought-provoking works today with a proper reading of that policy.
However, the real goal of this policy probably isn't to dictate actual policy into stone tablets for the masses to follow. The real goal of the policy probably is to give PayPal carte-blanche to do whatever the hell they want to dictate culture and impact politics without getting sued.
If you become annoying or a political adversary of PayPal's management, they can find something to ban you and hurt you with.
If you technically violate the policy, but aren't their opposition, I'm sure you will be ignored.