Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"There should be one -- and preferably only one -- obvious way to do it. If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea." AFAIK there is not a JavaScript version of Python which is fully compliant with the Python 2.6 specification.



I think he meant that it would be better if the Python interpreter would be implemented in Javascript. right?


Yes, and I meant that it would not be better to do this in JavaScript: It's far eaiser and simpler to have a real Python interpreter be doing the heavy lifting.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: